It was coming up for 1am local time when Gareth Southgate walked back out to acknowledge the England supporters inside the Luzhniki Stadium who were refusing to leave until he gave them one more appearance. He waved politely. He dropped his water bottle and applauded back. Briefly he scratched his head and blew out his cheeks a little, as if he could not quite believe they were still there, waiting for him, singing that song again. He waved again. He bowed. But it was unmistakable sadness etched on his face.
Over time, when the pain subsides a little, he will reflect that England have come a long way since Euro 2016 ended with chants informing the players they were not fit to wear the shirt. England’s previous World Cup campaign was wrecked by two defeats in the first week. This one made it to day 28 before the killer blow in extra time of the semi-final. England had scored more goals than the team of 1966 and shattered their reputation as tournament football’s Slapstick XI.
That is progress in anyone’s language when there are so many wearers of that shirt with entirely different experiences. “People may have had a feeling that playing for England was always misery and regret and recrimination,” Southgate said. “Now, I think, they have seen it can be enjoyable.”
At the same time there is a risk here that the tidal wave of goodwill is threatening to submerge a difficult truth: that England were a goal ahead, 25 minutes from a World Cup final, before it all became too much for them. Croatia wore them down with a superior mix of football knowhow, durability and the rare form of competitive courage that had Juraj Vrdoljak, a columnist for Telesport, likening the comeback to an “adrenaline-charged man lifting a truck to save his child”. But it was still the case that England badly lost their way and, in fairness to the manager, he was willing to accept that fact.
In the dressing room afterwards Southgate told the players everything you would expect about being proud of their achievements, thanking them individually and pointing out the warmth of the England supporters at the final whistle. First, though, he felt compelled to point out what they had to do better in the future. Even in the rawest moments, with many of the players tearful, he wanted them to listen.
“I’m not sure it was perfect by any means because the whole place was desolate,” Southgate reflected, the morning after the night before.
“But what I did say was that they have to learn from the moments that matter. There was a period when it looked like [our approach was] ‘we have the lead and don’t want to give it away’ rather than ‘we keep playing’. Against the top teams they are the moments in which you continue to play and you keep being brave.”
Instead England looked what they were: a team that would give you everything, with some fine players and, indeed, some excellent ones, but lacking the mentality the elite sides possess when it comes to the biggest occasions. “We just lost a bit of composure,” Southgate said. It was a “cruel lesson”. He maintained eye contact even in the hardest moments of reflection. But he spoke so quietly at times you had to lean in to hear his voice.
If the immaturity of the team cost England, do not be too critical. Or at least remember it was the inexperience and freshness of this group of players that helped make them so attractive in the first place – unless you want to go back to those days in May when the nation was bickering about the non-selections of Jack Wilshere and Jonjo Shelvey and it became clear why Southgate had not used his Twitter account since April 2015.
At the next World Cup almost all these players will still be available and, in theory, better for the experience. Jordan Pickford will be 28, approaching the age when goalkeepers are supposed to peak. Marcus Rashford will still be young, at 24, but armed with another four years’ experience. Raheem Sterling, at 27, should be a more competent finisher than he is now. Harry Kane will be 28, Dele Alli 26, Jesse Lingard 29, John Stones 28, Harry Maguire 29, Ruben Loftus-Cheek 26 and Trent Alexander-Arnold 23.
L\'Amministratore ha disattivato l\'accesso in scrittura al pubblico.
Lorrain Cordain, massimo esponente mondiale di alimentazione evoluzionistica, autore del best seller “The Paleo Diet”, studioso degli effetti rigeneranti che tale alimentazione ha sulla parete dell’intestino. Le sue teorie e le sue sperimentazioni ci dicono che i cibi industriali, lattosio, caseina, glutine e legumi agiscono in modo infiammatorio sulla barriera intestinale.
Flavio Leonori con STAFFAN LINDEBERG, Docente universitario e studioso svedese, eminenza europea nell’alimentazione evoluzionistica, che ha svolto numerose ricerche sui danni causati dai cibi industriali consumati nel mondo occidentale soprattutto in relazione ad obesità e diabete..
ALLENARE LA SALUTE
Non occorre poi molto per stare in forma ed in salute... ma è necessario sapere COSA fare Imparare quali sono i cibi infiammatori e i nutrienti benefici, qual è il movimento che fa ottenere risultati in breve tempo e quello inutile. Non è più il tempo del FAI DA TE. Consulenze personalizzate, proposte con competenza e professionalità sono fondamentali per trovare la MIGLIORE PERFORMANCE sia nello sport professionistico che amatoriale, sia nel lavoro professionale che per il tempo libero, sia per una giovinezza esuberante e travolgente che per una vecchiaia dignitosa e serena. UNA NUOVA VIA E’ TRACCIATA.